What Impact Could Sequestration Have on Sandy Recovery?
Should the White House and Congress fail to come to terms on budget cuts, sequestration would trim significant dollars from disaster recovery.
- By Edward Van Embden
- Email the author
- February 28, 2013
The numbers above show the federal employees in New Jersey by county in 2012, according to the latest figures from Eye on Washington, a DC-based lobbying firm that tracks federal employment.
The interactive graphic compiles data from the Office of Personnel Management, Federal Employment Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
What it doesn't offer, however, is a look at how pending sequestration could impact the state's federal employees and the ongoing Hurricane Sandy recovery effort. Some officials say it's too soon to tell what impact sequestration cuts, which will total approximately $85 billion, could have, though the outlook isn't promising.
New Jersey and Gov. Chris Christie are leaning on the federal government to cover the cost of recovery following Sandy. The $50.7 billion Sandy relief bill that was passed by Congress in January was intended to help New Jersey, along with New York and Connecticut, rebuild.
But even that bill isn't immune to sequestration. Departments like the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Housing and Urban Development, which would receive portions of funding from the bill to be used in disaster assistance and recovery efforts, would see cuts.
According to the Washington Post, sequestration would cost FEMA approximately $878 million. Of that total, about $580 million would be cut specifically from the agency's disaster recovery budget.
HUD would also be a victim of sequestration. Though it's immediately unclear as to how much HUD would be impacted, state legislators have said that funding for the Community Development Block Grants, a grant program that will be used to help New Jersey small businesses to reopen and residents affected by Sandy cover the cost of elevating their homes, would see cuts.
In his State budget address Tuesday, Gov. Chris Christie unveiled his $32.9 billion budget and along with it $40 million in funding for a Sandy recovery contingency plan. The funding, he said, would be used to as a last resort, stopgap aid used to bridge the delay gap between recovery projects and anticipated federal aid.
The hope is that whatever amount of the $40 million is used would eventually be recouped.
With sequestration looming, however, the contingency plan might not be enough. State Sen. Linda Greestein, D-14, a member of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee, said sequestration means trouble for New Jersey and its recovery efforts.
In his 45-minute budget presentation, Christie did not mention sequestration specifically, though he did call on legislators in Washington, D.C. to work together to resolve their issues, something he said they haven't been willing to do.
Sequestration will go into affect tomorrow, March 1 should the White House and Congress fail to reach some sort of budget cut compromise. The full impact of the cuts would not be immediately known until Friday, however, when the federal government would be forced to alert impacted agencies.
Hank Kerchef
4:56 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
The Republiscums don't care. The last thing on their mind is giving a schitt about people.
SonOfLiberty
6:31 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
In actuality, it must be Obama that doesn't care. Sequestration was his idea back when he was campaigning for the most recent election and he threatened to veto ANYTHING the would stop it. Made him look like he was really tough on the budget and the deficit.
Now that he has been elected, he wants his spending back, and he uses the age old rhetoric of Chicken-Little-Speak to scare the People into thinking we are on the cusp of an economic and public service tragedy. Cops won't show up for hours when you call 911, houses will burn to the ground due to cuts in fire fighters, people will die from common accidents because of degradation in EMS Services, and children will starve because school lunch programs will be cut and parents are too stupid to figure out how to feed them.
Do you not even understand this is not an actual CUT in spending, it is just slowing the rate of growth. Even with sequestration we will still be spending more in 2013 than we did in 2012. It is like saying instead of spending $3.78 this year we are going to spend $3.74 which is still more then the $3.72 we spent last year. It is literally a 1% reduction in the RATE of spending growth. Are we really so fragile that the state of our national economy lies in the balance of a 1% reduction in the rate of Federal spending? If so, we have bigger problems, a.k.a. Greece anyone?
Obama OWNS this fabricated crisis!
Sal
6:23 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
To: Hank, Actually I think the Republicans do care. While George Bush was our President for 8 years federal workers received a reasonable salary increase every year and there were no efforts at all by Republicans to reduce federal employees wages or benefits or make them pay more towards their pensions and FERS. The problem our nation faces today is just a harsh reality. The deficits are huge and we all know that cannot continue forever, so some cutting has to be made along with some tax increases. Federal employees have been doing far more sacrificing than any other group. Federal Workers Compensation has already been reduced from 75% down to 50% of base salary. They are already contributing more towards their pensions. Furloughs and losing 20% of their pay will hurt them, especially the ones earning under $50,000 per year, because their rents, mortgages, electricity bills etc. do not also automatically go down by 20%.
Hopefully the House and President will come to an agreement soon and the negative effects will be minimized. What is sad about all this is that neither political party has said we can save money by not paying for military bases in Japan, S. Korea, Italy, Germany, Spain etc. and let those countries pay for their own defense or reimburse us if they want our bases there.
Joe Cool
7:36 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
This is typical Barry Obama. He starts off by saying if everything fails it's not his fault and puts all the blame on congress, then when everything works out, he will take credit and say see what happens when we work together.. Barry will go down as the worst president we have ever had...the next president could be from the Taliban and be a better president than Barry..God help us
Kile LoPeimont
7:38 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
This was Obama's idea in the first place. I am sick of all the lying and BS!! Stop this madness. An Uneducated Misinformed population is going to bring us to ashes!
ExChief
8:21 am on Friday, March 1, 2013
they are going to cut Sandy recover funds yet send $70 million to syria to the rebels? anyone else have a problem with this?
Wally Wall
6:37 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
Dont you want Syria to be our friends ? LOL ! How about we ground Air Force One so the snakeoil salesman can stay can stay in Washington and START doing his job ! Does anyone know how many days he has Actually been in Washington in the last 4 plus years ? I know it is not alot. Can he kick the can down the road for another 4 years ?
Chris F
5:59 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013
I'm disgusted with our government.